Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Seebs <usenet-nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Oct 2009 17:03:56 GMT
On 2009-10-27, Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is too narrow for my taste but I accept it is a distinction that
can be made. You stated elsewhere that constant expressions are a
syntactic construct, but the definition requires the Constraints
section so presumably you include in "syntax" the constraints whilst
excluding all other restrictions?
Not quite. Rather, I believe that, if you follow the syntax down far
enough, you can tell them apart, because constant values can be distinguished
from variables.
My preference is simply not to treat these categories as having hard
boundaries because the specification does not seem formal enough to
support such a rigid distinction.
Could be. In which case, the claim that you can tell whether or not something
could have side effects by looking at the syntax becomes essentially useless.
-s
--
Copyright 2009, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nospam@xxxxxxxxx
http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- References:
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Seebs
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Seebs
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Nick Keighley
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: spinoza1111
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Seebs
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Seebs
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Seebs
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- From: Ben Bacarisse
- Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- Prev by Date: Re: Improving efficiency of a bytecode interpreter
- Next by Date: Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- Previous by thread: Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- Next by thread: Re: subroutine stack and C machine model
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|