comp.lang.c

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Free download lectures of Programming,Web designing and Computer Science
  • From: alamzeb123
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Array with no elements
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Odd Macro Problem
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Array with no elements
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Luca Forlizzi
• Re: Array with no elements
  • From: Ian Collins
• Array with no elements
  • From: paragk
• Re: Is the checksum being computed according to the requirement ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Is the checksum being computed according to the requirement ?
  • From: John
• Re: Is the checksum being computed according to the requirement ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Is the checksum being computed according to the requirement ?
  • From: John
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: Gene
• Re: preprocessor macro problem
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Joel C. Salomon
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: John
• Re: Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is this program doing what is supposed to do ?
  • From: steve
• Is this C program doing what it is supposed to do ?
  • From: John
• Re: Is this program doing what is supposed to do ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Is this program doing what is supposed to do ?
  • From: devkays
• Re: preprocessor macro problem
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: preprocessor macro problem
  • From: none
• preprocessor macro problem
  • From: Erik Arle
• Re: NUMERICAL RECIPES
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: NUMERICAL RECIPES
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Willem
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: discover array offsets within initializer?
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Odd Macro Problem
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Not as expected.
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Not as expected.
  • From: kid joe
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: James Waldby
• Odd Macro Problem
  • From: kid joe
• Not as expected.
  • From: dmjcunha
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: discover array offsets within initializer?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Infix to Postfix program not giving correct output
  • From: BartC
• Re: Infix to Postfix program not giving correct output
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: James Kuyper
• Infix to Postfix program not giving correct output
  • From: Maxx
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Luca Forlizzi
• discover array offsets within initializer?
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: return local variable (or pointer to object) from function
  • From: Mickey Mouse
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Willem
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Willem
• Re: return local variable (or pointer to object) from function
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: return local variable (or pointer to object) from function
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: Seebs
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: paragk
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: paragk
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: Seebs
• Re: return local variable (or pointer to object) from function
  • From: Angus
• String: "anti" string oprator
  • From: paragk
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: [newbie] return local variable (or pointer to object) from function
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: BST insertion
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: copx
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: copx
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: jacob navia
• BST insertion
  • From: Roshan
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: copx
• Re: header include compatibility question
  • From: songbird
• Re: header include compatibility question
  • From: songbird
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [newbie] return local variable (or pointer to object) from function
  • From: Mickey Mouse
• [newbie] return local variable (or pointer to object) from function
  • From: Mark
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: header include compatibility question
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: header include compatibility question
  • From: Jorgen Grahn
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Jorgen Grahn
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Hans Vlems
• Re: header include compatibility question
  • From: Seebs
• header include compatibility question
  • From: songbird
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: copx
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: dSpam@xxxxxxxx
• Re: inline vs. function pointers
  • From: Eric Sosman
• BEAUTIFUL ACTRESS***VIDEOS AND PICTURES HERE
  • From: success all
• free software download
  • From: mani ma
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Mickey Mouse
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Hans Vlems
• inline vs. function pointers
  • From: copx
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Dr Nick
• Re: return values
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Mickey Mouse
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Hans Vlems
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Paul N
• instructor's solutions manual for Fundamentals of Corporate Finance 9th edition by Ross
  • From: peter kalvin
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Seebs
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: David Mathog
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: Edward Rutherford
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Vikram
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: David Mathog
• Re: c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• c99 uint32_t (etc.) corresponding portable printf format specifiers?
  • From: David Mathog
• Re: waiting period
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• USA free classifieds for advertising !!! Just free for you !!!
  • From: Marrina anderson tina
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: [OT] Re: waiting period
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: James Kuyper
• [OT] Re: waiting period
  • From: Eric Sosman
• [OT] Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: waiting period
  • From: copx
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Noob
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: return values
  • From: Uno
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Michael Mouse
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Seebs
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: James Lothian
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Bartc
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Alan Curry
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Willem
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: waiting period
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Joel C. Salomon
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Hans Vlems
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Hans Vlems
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Dann Corbit
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Vikram
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: waiting period
  • From: Angel
• Re: waiting period
  • From: David Resnick
• waiting period
  • From: Hans Vlems
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Bart van Ingen Schenau
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: casting const away
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Bartc
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: ldries46
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Tiny C error - initializer element is not constant
  • From: TheFlyingDutchman
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Largest Collection Of Solutions Manuals & Test Banks Over The Net (Part Five)
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Tiny C error - initializer element is not constant
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Tiny C error - initializer element is not constant
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Alan Curry
• Re: Tiny C error - initializer element is not constant
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Bartc
• Tiny C error - initializer element is not constant
  • From: TheFlyingDutchman
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: pozz
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Dann Corbit
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Fred
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Paul N
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: James Lothian
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Willem
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Willem
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Vikram
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Garbage produced
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Bartc
• Garbage produced
  • From: Vikram
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Willem
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: pozz
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: return values
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Open GL GL\gl.h and GL\glu.h
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: Open GL GL\gl.h and GL\glu.h
  • From: Bartc
• Open GL GL\gl.h and GL\glu.h
  • From: ldries46
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Noob
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: ldries46
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: pozz
• Re: Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Is memcpy with len=0 a NOP?
  • From: Noob
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: ldries46
• Re: OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: return values
  • From: Hans Vlems
• OpenGL with Windows 7
  • From: ldries46
• Re: return values
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• CodeFest - Online Coding Festival by Computer Engineering Society, IT-BHU
  • From: codefest11
• CodeFest - Online Coding Festival by Computer Engineering Society, IT-BHU
  • From: codefest11
• CodeFest - Online Coding Festival by Computer Engineering Society, IT-BHU
  • From: codefest11
• CodeFest - Online Coding Festival by Computer Engineering Society, IT-BHU
  • From: codefest11
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: pozz
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: pozz
• Re: casting const away
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Bartc
• Re: return values
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Data alignment and endianess
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: pozz
• Re: what's wrong with this path combine function?
  • From: Alia K
• Re: return values
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Data alignment and endianess
  • From: pozz
• Re: what's wrong with this path combine function?
  • From: PKM
• Re: what's wrong with this path combine function?
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: what's wrong with this path combine function?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: casting const away
  • From: James Kuyper
• what's wrong with this path combine function?
  • From: Alia K
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: return values
  • From: Uno
• Re: return values
  • From: Sherm Pendley
• return values
  • From: Uno
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: How to get string from front of array to position x?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: How to get string from front of array to position x?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: How to get string from front of array to position x?
  • From: Willem
• How to get string from front of array to position x?
  • From: Angus
• Re: stuck
  • From: ec429
• Re: stuck
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: ??? ??? ????? ????
  • From: Mickey Mouse
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Design decision
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Re: Design decision
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Design decision
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Design decision
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Re: Design decision
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Curses library for gcc under DOS...??
  • From: Mickey Mouse
• Design decision
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Curses library for gcc under DOS...??
  • From: Sherm Pendley
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Curses library for gcc under DOS...??
  • From: Robert Bralic
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: steve
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Seebs
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: steve
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: cexp implementation questions
  • From: steve
• cexp implementation questions
  • From: steve
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: pozz
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: pozz
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: pozz
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: David Hutto
• Re: strange scanf
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Seebs
• Re: strange scanf
  • From: Joel C. Salomon
• strange scanf
  • From: Shivanand Kadwadkar
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Mark Bluemel
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Mark Bluemel
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Mark Bluemel
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Declartation in C
  • From: Pavel Borzenkov
• Declartation in C
  • From: ldries46
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Mark Bluemel
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Richard
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: pozz
• Re: Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: Noob
• Re: Can't seem to ring that pole!
  • From: mikey
• Formatting a number in a different way
  • From: pozz
• Re: Please Help Linked list problems!
  • From: pete
• Please Help Linked list problems!
  • From: RBCC
• Re: stuck
  • From: Richard
• Re: stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: stuck
  • From: BruceS
• Re: stuck
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: stuck
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: L-value problem
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: L-value problem
  • From: Pete
• Re: [OT] C Programmer Driven Insane by Excel VBA
  • From: litchie
• Re: Can't seem to ring that pole!
  • From: litchie
• Re: stuck
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can't seem to ring that pole!
  • From: Richard
• looking for having better solution to promote your products.
  • From: Marrina anderson tina
• THE TRUTH TO MAKING $13,693.94 IN 48 HOURS
  • From: superman
• Re: stuck
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Updated List of Solutions Manuals & Test Banks 16, JAN, 2011
  • From: Student.Plus@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: problems with windows sockets
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• How to lose calories before your wedding
  • From: something healthy
• Re: Can't seem to ring that pole!
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Can't seem to ring that pole!
  • From: Geoff
• Can't seem to ring that pole!
  • From: Lloyd Fuller
• Re: stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: void arguments
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: void arguments
  • From: ec429
• Re: stuck
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: tm
• Re: L-value problem
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: L-value problem
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: L-value problem
  • From: Ian Collins
• L-value problem
  • From: Pete
• Re: void arguments
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: stuck
  • From: Niklas Holsti
• Re: stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: stuck
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: stuck
  • From: Pavel Borzenkov
• Re: stuck
  • From: steve
• Re: stuck
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Rui Maciel
• stuck
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: void arguments
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: void arguments
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: void arguments
  • From: Seebs
• Re: void arguments
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: void arguments
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: void arguments
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• void arguments
  • From: Cross
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Uno
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Uno
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Retreving a context menu's hWnd
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Retreving a context menu's hWnd
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Retreving a context menu's hWnd
  • From: pviewer
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Richard Sanders
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Richard Sanders
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Cgi and file access
  • From: Richard Sanders
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Richard Sanders
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Nick Austin
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Geoff
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: None
• Re: Cgi and file access
  • From: Nick
• Re: Cgi and file access
  • From: francesco
• Re: Cgi and file access
  • From: francesco
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Cgi and file access
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Niklas Holsti
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Cgi and file access
  • From: Tim Harig
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Sebastian
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Cgi and file access
  • From: francesco
• Re: Cgi and file access
  • From: Tim Harig
• Cgi and file access
  • From: francesco
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Richard Sanders
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Geoff
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: James Waldby
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: hqin
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: BartC
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: PKM
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: hqin
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Sherm Pendley
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: tm
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: PKM
• conflict function definition with stdlib.h
  • From: hqin
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: tm
• Re: problems with windows sockets
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: Nobody
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: BartC
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: problems with windows sockets
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: problems with windows sockets
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: [OT] OS function read() and write()
  • From: io_x
• Re: problems with windows sockets
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: [OT] OS function read() and write()
  • From: io_x
• Re: [OT] OS function read() and write()
  • From: io_x
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: Nobody
• Re: problems with windows sockets
  • From: Pavel Borzenkov
• Re: [OT] OS function read() and write()
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: problems with windows sockets
  • From: Tom St Denis
• problems with windows sockets
  • From: GilNajera
• [OT] OS function read() and write()
  • From: io_x
• Yet another one-page toy interpretter
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: tm
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: u want join this group
  • From: TheGunslinger
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Alan Curry
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C Programmer Driven Insane by Excel VBA
  • From: bert
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Tobias Blass
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Thomas Richter
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Alan Curry
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: tm
• [OT] C Programmer Driven Insane by Excel VBA
  • From: Robert Latest
• u want join this group
  • From: vani
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason
• join this group
  • From: suba
• start a new discussion
  • From: suba
• u want join this group
  • From: suba
• u want join this group
  • From: suba
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Tobias Blass
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Richard
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: tm
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: TonyMc
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: tm
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Noob
• Re: help with snippet from c-faq.com
  • From: Mark
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: help with snippet from c-faq.com
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: help with snippet from c-faq.com
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• help with snippet from c-faq.com
  • From: Mark
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: casting const away
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: sandeep
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Jorgen Grahn
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Web site for the containers library
  • From: Charles
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: pete
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: pete
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: Mark
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: pete
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: Mark
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: Mark
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: pete
• Re: stuck with macro
  • From: Ian Collins
• stuck with macro
  • From: Mark
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: BartC
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Chris H
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Georg Peter
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Nick Bowler
• Interview with Mr Stroustrup
  • From: sandeep
• Re: Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: Nobody
• Re: NUMERICAL RECIPES
  • From: Seebs
• Pack bitmap bytes into native-endian 32bit int
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: NUMERICAL RECIPES
  • From: Seebs
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Georg Peter
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Chris H
• Re: NUMERICAL RECIPES
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Web site for the containers library
  • From: Tim Harig
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Angel
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: robin
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Altering the system clock
  • From: Nobody
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Web site for the containers library
  • From: Charles
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: arnuld
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Seebs
• Re: newbie: socket api
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Altering the system clock
  • From: Seebs
• Re: sscanf() safety
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: sscanf() safety
  • From: Cross
• Re: A basic (?) problem with addresses (gcc)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Zahnaerztin Zahnarzt , stellenangebot ausland , im ausland arbeiten , nebenjob ausland , stellenangebote in ausland , gemeinnuetzige arbeit im ausland , jobboerse lehrstellen , krankenschwester stellenangebote , jobboerse stellengesuche , + + + +
  • From: http://groups.google.com/group/de.comp.os.os2.networking/post
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Chris H
• Re: casting const away
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: newbie: socket api
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: newbie: socket api
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Richard
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: ImpalerCore
• newbie: socket api
  • From: Thomas
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: amuro
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Richard
• Re: casting const away
  • From: gwowen
• Re: Web site for the containers library
  • From: jacob navia
• Altering the system clock
  • From: jny0
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: arnuld
• Re: passing a pointer to a 2D array to a function
  • From: Fred
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Seebs
• Re: casting const away
  • From: copx
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: arnuld
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: Owen Jacobson
• Segfault - strcpy() copying into array
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is compiler always takes care of adding '\0' in character array initialization ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: BartC
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Is compiler always takes care of adding '\0' in character array initialization ?
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: sscanf() safety
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Is compiler always takes care of adding '\0' in character array initialization ?
  • From: Shivanand Kadwadkar
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Seebs
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Seebs
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Richard
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Richard
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Geoff
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: tm
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Francis Moreau
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Francis Moreau
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: catcalls
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Chris H
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Jorgen Grahn
• Re: ORMs for applications written in C
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: main() again, and const
  • From: Uno
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Uno
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Seebs
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: catcalls
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: catcalls
• Re: binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: Ian Collins
• binary to C (gcc GNU/Linux compiled machine code)
  • From: catcalls
• Re: main() again, and const
  • From: ec429
• Re: main() again, and const
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• main() again, and const
  • From: ec429
• Re: ORMs for applications written in C
  • From: Nobody
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: James Waldby
• Re: ORMs for applications written in C
  • From: Richard
• Re: ORMs for applications written in C
  • From: gvk
• Re: ORMs for applications written in C
  • From: Seebs
• Re: ORMs for applications written in C
  • From: gvk
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Chris H
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Richard
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: ImpalerCore
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: BartC
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: BartC
• actress hot
  • From: selvaraju.t maruthaslam.t
• respected sir
  • From: selvaraju.t maruthaslam.t
• Re: How to check whether malloc has allocated memory properly in case if malloc(0) can return valid pointer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How to check whether malloc has allocated memory properly in case if malloc(0) can return valid pointer
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: casting const away
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: casting const away
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: More on debuggers
  • From: JG
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: ImpalerCore
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Seebs
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Seebs
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: getchar() question
  • From: Richard
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• getchar() question
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Luca Forlizzi
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason
• Re: casting const away
  • From: gwowen
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Francis Moreau
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: arnuld
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Francis Moreau
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Alan Curry
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: lccwin fails to generate NOPs
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: SofTeC 2010: Listen to testing experts from Dell, Infogain etc [Nov 13th, New Delhi]
  • From: HARDIN33Maritza
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: casting const away
  • From: copx
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: casting const away
  • From: sandeep
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: casting const away
  • From: copx
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: BartC
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Georg Peter
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: ImpalerCore
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Georg Peter
• Re: casting const away
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: casting const away
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: arnuld
• Re: casting const away
  • From: copx
• Re: lccwin fails to generate NOPs
  • From: Noob
• Re: casting const away
  • From: copx
• Re: casting const away
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: casting const away
  • From: copx
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Chris H
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Georg Peter
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Georg Peter
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Chris H
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: arnuld
• casting const away
  • From: copx
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Nick Bowler
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Georg Peter
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: ImpalerCore
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: rosario
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: ImpalerCore
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: pete
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: ImpalerCore
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: lccwin fails to generate NOPs
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: strtoul() behavior
  • From: Ike Naar
• strtoul() behavior
  • From: arnuld
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: gepe
• Re: A basic (?) problem with addresses (gcc)
  • From: Joshua Maurice
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Michael Press
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• programming puzzles
  • From: code-forum.blogspot.com
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Definition of perror() ?
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Definition of perror() ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Definition of perror() ?
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• sir iam talk now yes sure number8122560075 iam name is askar ali
  • From: askarali m
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Hans Vlems
• Re: sscanf() safety
  • From: Cross
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• kadal aunukkal songs in xxx***seans in rob aaaaaaaa
  • From: askarali m
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Hans Vlems
• Re: Dynamic memory allocation with static pointer variable
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Dynamic memory allocation with static pointer variable
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Getting a runtime error::"The instruction at 0x004010b4 referenced memory at 0x00000000. The memory could not be read
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Getting a runtime error::"The instruction at 0x004010b4 referenced memory at 0x00000000. The memory could not be read
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Navaneeth
• Re: Assign file to stdout problem
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Navaneeth
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Can I assume fgets won't modify last bytes of output array if unused ?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Assign file to stdout problem
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Search Jobs for Executives, Find career openings in top companies
  • From: khushitiwari2001@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Definition of perror() ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Definition of perror() ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Definition of perror() ?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Can I assume fgets won't modify last bytes of output array if unused ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Definition of perror() ?
  • From: Disc Magnet
• Re: Can I assume fgets won't modify last bytes of output array if unused ?
  • From: Edward A. Falk
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: BartC
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Marcin Grzegorczyk
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Richard
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Can I assume fgets won't modify last bytes of output array if unused ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: BartC
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Mateusz_madi
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Hans Vlems
• Re: Can I assume fgets won't modify last bytes of output array if unused ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: jacob navia
• Arisingsoft provides the Norton antivirus all in one security suite.
  • From: mani ma
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Mateusz_madi
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Good msg and Crazy Msg 4 all
  • From: Sumera
• Re: NUMERICAL RECIPES
  • From: Gene
• Re: Strange bug
  • From: pete
• Re: defining large datatypes
  • From: BGB
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Seebs
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Willem
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: sandeep
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Alan Curry
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Seebs
• ORMs for applications written in C
  • From: gvk
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can I assume fgets won't modify last bytes of output array if unused ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Angus
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Angus
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Seebs
• Re: position of \0 while using fgets()
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: standard doubt
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Assign file to stdout problem
  • From: Seebs
• Re: A basic (?) problem with addresses (gcc)
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: position of \0 while using fgets()
  • From: Cross
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: position of \0 while using fgets()
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: position of \0 while using fgets()
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: position of \0 while using fgets()
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• position of \0 while using fgets()
  • From: Cross
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: BartC
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: BartC
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Can I assume fgets won't modify last bytes of output array if unused ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: possibly undefined operation
  • From: Jorgen Grahn
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: pete
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Nick Keighley
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: Willem
• Re: for conditional handling question
  • From: jacob navia
• for conditional handling question
  • From: Angus
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: standard doubt
  • From: Niklas Holsti
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why is this expression detected as undefined by GCC, Splint?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Can I assume fgets won't modify last bytes of output array if unused ?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: How to check whether malloc has allocated memory properly in case if malloc(0) can return valid pointer
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: A basic (?) problem with addresses (gcc)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: A basic (?) problem with addresses (gcc)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Storing and displaying numbers the indicies of number that appear 3+ times in an array at O(n*logn) or better
  • From: Willem
• Re: A basic (?) problem with addresses (gcc)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: A basic (?) problem with addresses (gcc)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: strcpy overlapping memory
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Assign file to stdout problem
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: More on debuggers
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Strange bug
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: BGB
• Re: Strange bug
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Storing and displaying numbers the indicies of number that appear 3+ times in an array at O(n*logn) or better
  • From: perditi0n2002
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Storing and displaying numbers the indicies of number that appear 3+ times in an array at O(n*logn) or better
  • From: perditi0n2002
• Re: Storing and displaying numbers the indicies of number that appear 3+ times in an array at O(n*logn) or better
  • From: Willem
• Storing and displaying numbers the indicies of number that appear 3+ times in an array at O(n*logn) or better
  • From: perditi0n2002
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: calling fuction with function pointer in C99
  • From: BartC
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Seebs
• Re: sequential-evaluation operation result
  • From: Seebs
• Re: calling fuction with function pointer in C99
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Why this doesn't work
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Why this doesn't work
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• calling fuction with function pointer in C99
  • From: Shivanand Kadwadkar
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: Open source vs Microsoft vs public domain
  • From: tm
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Nick
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: endian-ness
  • From: Cross
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Shivanand Kadwadkar
• Re: endian-ness
  • From: Cross
• Re: Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: standard doubt
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: sequential-evaluation operation result
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Chris H
• Re: sequential-evaluation operation result
  • From: christian.bau
• sequential-evaluation operation result
  • From: Shivanand Kadwadkar
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Navaneeth
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Navaneeth
• Signed Char representation in C language
  • From: Shivanand Kadwadkar
• C language now truly universal
  • From: kerravon
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Alan Curry
• Re: Why this doesn't work
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Why this doesn't work
  • From: luser- -droog
• Re: Why this doesn't work
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: Why this doesn't work
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Why this doesn't work
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Edward A. Falk
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Where to download C99 Standard
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Seebs
• Re: Question about octal
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Questions on conversions between char* to unsigned char* and vice versa
  • From: Keith Thompson

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > C_CPP  > comp.lang.c  > 2011-01