Restricted unsigned integer range would have been better?
- From: "Ansel" <tinker454@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:32:59 -0600
If C's unsigned integer types were designed so that their maximum value was
the same as the absolute value of the same width signed integer type's
minimum value, wouldn't that automagically elimintate a bunch of erroneous
code and simplify programming in C?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Restricted unsigned integer range would have been better?
- From: pete
- Re: Restricted unsigned integer range would have been better?
- From: BartC
- Re: Restricted unsigned integer range would have been better?
- From: Nobody
- Re: Restricted unsigned integer range would have been better?
- From: christian.bau
- Re: Restricted unsigned integer range would have been better?
- Prev by Date: Re: about scanf()
- Next by Date: Re: Restricted unsigned integer range would have been better?
- Previous by thread: Gender, Representativeness and Reputation in StackOverflow
- Next by thread: Re: Restricted unsigned integer range would have been better?
- Index(es):