C++ as OOP language
From: BDob (bdob125_at_at.att.net)
Date: 12/03/03
- Next message: Felix E. Klee: "Re: (double one=1.) != 1. ?"
- Previous message: Dan W.: "Re: Nested templates explicit specialization"
- Next in thread: Victor Bazarov: "Re: C++ as OOP language"
- Reply: Victor Bazarov: "Re: C++ as OOP language"
- Reply: Jack Klein: "Re: C++ as OOP language"
- Reply: EventHelix.com: "Re: C++ as OOP language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:17:06 GMT
Why people say that C++ as an OOP language has a tight coupling of type and
function?
Why C++, compared to C, is flexible and handle changes better?
- Next message: Felix E. Klee: "Re: (double one=1.) != 1. ?"
- Previous message: Dan W.: "Re: Nested templates explicit specialization"
- Next in thread: Victor Bazarov: "Re: C++ as OOP language"
- Reply: Victor Bazarov: "Re: C++ as OOP language"
- Reply: Jack Klein: "Re: C++ as OOP language"
- Reply: EventHelix.com: "Re: C++ as OOP language"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
