Re: Windows Compiler Recommendations
From: Brian Genisio (BrianGenisio_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 01/13/04
- Next message: Venkat: "Re: File Open and Close"
- Previous message: Nick Hounsome: "Re: Factory method -- best practices for portability"
- In reply to: Derek: "Windows Compiler Recommendations"
- Next in thread: Bryan Bullard: "Re: Windows Compiler Recommendations"
- Reply: Bryan Bullard: "Re: Windows Compiler Recommendations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:34:20 -0500
Derek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am taking introductory C++ in college, and we use MS Visual C++ in
> class. :-(
>
> I want to be independent from Microsoft (or as independent as I can be
> while developing on Windows!) Are there any good, easy-to-use GNU
> compilers for windows? What do you recommend?
>
> Thanks,
> Derek
Yeah...
mingw is a direct port,
cygwin is a POSIX port, which then ports the tools using POSIX.
mingw is faster and more minimal
cygwin has everything you would expect in a Linux distribution
Both have shells (sh, bash) ported to windows.
The Bloodshed DevC++ mentioned by the other poster uses mingw by
default, but it can be set up to use cygwin.
DevC++ is open source and cross platform, so the same development
environment can theoretically be used on many platforms (nice)
Good luck,
Brian
- Next message: Venkat: "Re: File Open and Close"
- Previous message: Nick Hounsome: "Re: Factory method -- best practices for portability"
- In reply to: Derek: "Windows Compiler Recommendations"
- Next in thread: Bryan Bullard: "Re: Windows Compiler Recommendations"
- Reply: Bryan Bullard: "Re: Windows Compiler Recommendations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|