Re: static functions
From: Julián Albo (JULIANALBO_at_terra.es)
Date: 02/24/04
- Next message: Vijayaraghavan Kalyanapasupathy: "Smart Pointers and "new""
- Previous message: Dietmar Kuehl: "Re: streambuf"
- In reply to: jeffc: "Re: static functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:07:44 +0100
jeffc escribió:
> I just thought your answer was going to be confusing to the OP. He seemed
> to understand the basic idea that a static function is not automatically
> associated with an instance of a class like a member function is.
I think the contrary. I have seen people seeing a static function using
a private member of an object of his class and saying they have readed
that the static have no access to the non static members.
Regards.
- Next message: Vijayaraghavan Kalyanapasupathy: "Smart Pointers and "new""
- Previous message: Dietmar Kuehl: "Re: streambuf"
- In reply to: jeffc: "Re: static functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|