Derivation guideline
From: Julie (julie_at_nospam.com)
Date: 03/30/04
- Next message: O.B.: "protected constructor problem"
- Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: "composite" classes?"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Reply: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Reply: Claudio Puviani: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Reply: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Reply: Old Wolf: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:43:26 -0800
Would the following be considered and acceptable guideline:
(In the absence of documentation)
- if a class definition has virtual method(s), it is intended or suitable for
derivation
- if a class definition doesn't have virtual methods, it should *not* be
derived from
Comments, references?
- Next message: O.B.: "protected constructor problem"
- Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: "composite" classes?"
- Next in thread: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Reply: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Reply: Claudio Puviani: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Reply: E. Robert Tisdale: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Reply: Old Wolf: "Re: Derivation guideline"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|