Unix MQ's versus MQSeries MQ's
From: Dave (dfbrownau_at_yahoo.com.au)
Date: 03/31/04
- Next message: JasBascom: "writing to a text file from a binary file"
- Previous message: Leor Zolman: "Re: using-directive question"
- Next in thread: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: Unix MQ's versus MQSeries MQ's"
- Reply: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: Unix MQ's versus MQSeries MQ's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 31 Mar 2004 08:35:15 -0800
Hi.
My project manager has TOLD me that we are using IBM's MQSeries for 1.
Transformation from say tag + value to comma separated.
2. routing from one process to another on both the Internet and the
internet.
Why don't we just use MQ's and sockets from unix with c++?
He thinks that this is too complicated but I think MQSeries is way too
complicated.
I can get 1 or 2 people who believe that we should be using sockets
etc with Java or C++ but they have no authority of which technology
should be used.
We have a lot of messages going through our system and I have
experimented with a large work load to find Unix sockets better.
Can someone offer me some advice on which is best?
Thanks
- Next message: JasBascom: "writing to a text file from a binary file"
- Previous message: Leor Zolman: "Re: using-directive question"
- Next in thread: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: Unix MQ's versus MQSeries MQ's"
- Reply: Christopher Benson-Manica: "Re: Unix MQ's versus MQSeries MQ's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]