C++: why 80 charachters??
From: John Doe (johndoe_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 04/01/04
- Next message: Howard: "Re: Why Some Extended ASCIIs Can't Be Typed"
- Previous message: John Doe: "Re: Placement of {"
- Next in thread: Min,Lee: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Min,Lee: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Leor Zolman: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Mike Wahler: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: John Carson: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: red floyd: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Julie: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Derek: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Xenos: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: PlasmaDragon: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Claudio Puviani: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Thomas Matthews: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 09:36:28 -0600
I write code as long as 250+ columns sometimes (when the code refers to
a single concept), and I don't understand why people complain about
that. Just use the word wrap, right?
People who write 80 columns force everybody else in the world to see
their code in a narrow stripe of screen, when almost every programmer
nowdays has 1280x1024+ screen resolution. Many have 1600+!
If the algorithm does not fit into one screen, you are going to make
mistakes when writing or reading it. Losing 2/3 of the screen to stay
into 80 charachters seems nonsense to me.
- Next message: Howard: "Re: Why Some Extended ASCIIs Can't Be Typed"
- Previous message: John Doe: "Re: Placement of {"
- Next in thread: Min,Lee: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Min,Lee: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Leor Zolman: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Mike Wahler: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: John Carson: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: red floyd: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Julie: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Derek: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Xenos: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: PlasmaDragon: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Claudio Puviani: "Re: why 80 charachters??"
- Reply: Thomas Matthews: "Re: C++: why 80 charachters??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|