Re: What is problematic about static functions?
From: John Carson (donaldquixote_at_datafast.net.au)
Date: 04/02/04
- Next message: Ahti Legonkov: "Re: Syntax Error in throw()."
- Previous message: Leor Zolman: "Re: Multiple definition"
- In reply to: yanek: "Re: What is problematic about static functions?"
- Next in thread: Howard: "Re: What is problematic about static functions?"
- Reply: Howard: "Re: What is problematic about static functions?"
- Reply: Julie: "Re: What is problematic about static functions?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 02:17:59 +1000
"yanek" <yanivus@nana.co.il> wrote in message
news:34b3644c.0403312354.11c720f1@posting.google.com
> Homework? hell no, I've finished university a few years ago.
>
> I've been working NOT in the area for a couple of years, because of
> high unemployment percentage in Israel, and now had a job interview
> for C++ developer.
>
> Since it's a bit hard to get back to business, I asked those
> questions.
> Some of them before the interview and some after it, the ones I didn't
> know.
>
> Yes, you've really destroyed my confidence.
> Thank you.
>
> p.s. If you don't want to answer - just don't do it. Why do you allow
> yourself interpret my questions beyond C++?
> I guess you're one of those ppl who MUST remark fat ppl how fat they
> are and so on. This really hurt.
I don't think Howard was intending to be hurtful. It is simply a fact that a
lot of students post their homework questions here as a lazy way of getting
through their course. When a post looks like a homework question and when
there is no evidence that the person asking the question has done some work
on it, it is routine for people here to suggest that the person making the
post do some work on it first. It would not be a good thing if this forum
did become a way for people to get someone else to do their homework.
Noone here knows for sure whether or not a question is a homework question
and sometimes they get it wrong. Don't take it personally.
-- John Carson 1. To reply to email address, remove donald 2. Don't reply to email address (post here instead)
- Next message: Ahti Legonkov: "Re: Syntax Error in throw()."
- Previous message: Leor Zolman: "Re: Multiple definition"
- In reply to: yanek: "Re: What is problematic about static functions?"
- Next in thread: Howard: "Re: What is problematic about static functions?"
- Reply: Howard: "Re: What is problematic about static functions?"
- Reply: Julie: "Re: What is problematic about static functions?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|