Re: Is it standard and practical to use long long types?

From: Friedrich Dominicus (frido_at_q-software-solutions.com)
Date: 04/15/04 

Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 09:48:44 +0200

Dan.Pop@cern.ch (Dan Pop) writes:

> In <c5gs1j$cr9$1@news-reader2.wanadoo.fr> "jacob navia" <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> writes:
>
>>lcc-win32 supports long long.
>
> Unfortunately, it does it at the expense of not being conforming to any
> C standard. long long is a syntax error in C89 and lcc-win32 is NOT a
> conforming C99 implementation, either. So, I have yet to figure out
> what -ansic means to the lc and lcc commands.
>
> Then again, this is only one droplet in the ocean of lcc-win32 conformance
> problems...
Are you a bit paranoid? Just name one conforming C99 implementation
and then you can flame around as you like. Of course there is a
migration path from C89 to C99 if you can't see that, well that's you
problem

Friedrich