Re: Modifying through pointer-to-const
From: Walter Tross (walter_at_waltertross.com)
Date: 04/19/04
- Next message: Russell Hanneken: "Re: Modifying through pointer-to-const"
- Previous message: Old Wolf: "Re: speed vc++ vs. c++builder"
- In reply to: Dave: "Modifying through pointer-to-const"
- Next in thread: Russell Hanneken: "Re: Modifying through pointer-to-const"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 23:23:10 +0200
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:52:29 -0700, "Dave" <better_cs_now@yahoo.com>
wrote:
(snip)
> DynGaRec->MvPeriod[index] = currentEvPt; // ILLEGAL!!!
> DynGapRec->GapInteval[index] = pGap->i_GapEndMt[gapRecCnt]; //
>ILLEGAL!!!
It looks like MyPeriod and GapInterval are pointers, not arrays. In
this case they are const (because of your passing a const DynGap*
DynGapRec), but what they point to is not.
- Next message: Russell Hanneken: "Re: Modifying through pointer-to-const"
- Previous message: Old Wolf: "Re: speed vc++ vs. c++builder"
- In reply to: Dave: "Modifying through pointer-to-const"
- Next in thread: Russell Hanneken: "Re: Modifying through pointer-to-const"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
