Re: g++ (3.3) bug?

From: Michiel Salters (Michiel.Salters_at_logicacmg.com)
Date: 04/20/04 

Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:02:40 +0000 (UTC)

ataru@nospam.cyberspace.org (Christopher Benson-Manica) wrote in message news:<c6155c$4ni$1@chessie.cirr.com>...
> Kevin Goodsell <usenet2.spamfree.fusion@neverbox.com> spoke thus:
>
> (moving to comp.std.c++)
>
> > Christopher Benson-Manica wrote:
>
> >> __FUNCTION__ isn't standard, but C99 specifies the __func__ predefined
> >> identifier, which I believe is #define'd to be __FUNCTION__ for OP's
> >> implementation. I would be interested to know whether __func__ made
> >> it into standard C++ as well.
>
> > Not yet. C++ hasn't added any new features since the first standard in 1998.
>
> Does "not yet" mean that it's planned for the next version of the C++
> standard?

There is some obvious discussion about the meaning of __func__ in C++
special cases - the destructor mentioned before, namespaces - but it is
covered by the desire to create a viable subset of C99 and C++0x. So
s/planned/considered/ and you're right.

Regards,
Michiel Salters 

---
[ comp.std.c++ is moderated.  To submit articles, try just posting with ]
[ your news-reader.  If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu    ]
[              --- Please see the FAQ before posting. ---               ]
[ FAQ: http://www.jamesd.demon.co.uk/csc/faq.html                       ]