Re: I need an understanding of what C++ is good for -Thanks
From: jeffc (nobody_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 04/20/04
- Next message: David Riebenbauer: "Re: The "const" modifier"
- Previous message: Artie Gold: "Re: Std Map .. Help"
- In reply to: Howard: "Re: I need an understanding of what C++ is good for -Thanks"
- Next in thread: Howard: "Re: I need an understanding of what C++ is good for -Thanks"
- Reply: Howard: "Re: I need an understanding of what C++ is good for -Thanks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:09:31 -0400
"Howard" <alicebt@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c63rfs$d6m@dispatch.concentric.net...
>
> It's not so ridiculous! I actually tend to agree with Mr. Tisdale on
this.
> A truly good programmer should be able to pick up a new language rather
> easily. Now, given the (at least potential) complexity of C++, I would
> hardly expect the person to become a "good C++ programmer" in a few
weeks...
Exactly, which is why it's ridiculous not to ask about C++ programming.
- Next message: David Riebenbauer: "Re: The "const" modifier"
- Previous message: Artie Gold: "Re: Std Map .. Help"
- In reply to: Howard: "Re: I need an understanding of what C++ is good for -Thanks"
- Next in thread: Howard: "Re: I need an understanding of what C++ is good for -Thanks"
- Reply: Howard: "Re: I need an understanding of what C++ is good for -Thanks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]