Re: [OT] Challenge response.
From: Shailesh Humbad (s_at_mailpass.com)
Date: 05/05/04
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- In reply to: Nils Petter Vaskinn: "[OT] Challenge response. (was: Microsoft C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 7.00)"
- Next in thread: Bill Seurer: "Re: [OT] Challenge response."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 06:43:29 GMT
Nils Petter Vaskinn wrote:
> On Sun, 02 May 2004 07:56:49 +0000, Shailesh Humbad wrote:
>
>
>
>>P.S. Check out my nifty new email address--completely spam-proof! Yes,
>>s@mailpass.com is my ACTUAL, non-munged email address. You (real
>>people) can email me, but spammers can't! You get an automatic reply
>>the first time you email me, and once you click on the verification link
>>in the reply, all your subsequent emails get through.
>
>
> Actually c/r mail schemes have a serious flaw: When you recieve spam with
> a faked "From" address you offload the burden of doing you spam checking
> onto the poor sod that had his address abused.
>
> Search alt.os.linux for msgid:
> <Hgxhc.3662$eZ5.2468@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> for a lengthy
> flamewar on the subject.
>
I posted a response to you in alt.spam.
- Previous message: Phil Carmody: "Re: Cracking DES with C++ is faster than Java?"
- In reply to: Nils Petter Vaskinn: "[OT] Challenge response. (was: Microsoft C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 7.00)"
- Next in thread: Bill Seurer: "Re: [OT] Challenge response."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
