Re: Abstract Class
From: Jeff Schwab (jeffplus_at_comcast.net)
Date: 05/18/04
- Next message: Joost Ronkes Agerbeek: "Construction of member objects"
- Previous message: JKop: "Re: Memory leak"
- In reply to: Julie: "Re: Abstract Class"
- Next in thread: Merlin: "Re: Abstract Class"
- Reply: Merlin: "Re: Abstract Class"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:37:58 -0400
Julie wrote:
> Victor Bazarov wrote:
>
>>Merlin wrote:
>>
>>>Been reading the GOF book and started to make the distinction between
>>>Class and Interface inheritance. One question though:
>>
>>One? Really?
>>
>>
>>>Do pure abstract classes have representations? (data members?)
>>
>>Some do, some don't. Up to you.
>>
>>
>>>What about abstract classes?
>>
>>What about them?
>>
>>
>>>Should abstract classes have a destructor and or constructor? What
>>>about pure abstract classes?
>>
>>They should when needed.
>>
>>
>>>What are the conditions that must be satisfied for a class to be
>>>
>>>A) Pure Abstract class
>>>B) Abstract Class
>>
>>Homework questions should be answered by reading your textbook.
>
>
> What is the purpose of such senseless non-responses and blind assumptions?
Victor answered the meaningful questions correctly and concisely.
- Next message: Joost Ronkes Agerbeek: "Construction of member objects"
- Previous message: JKop: "Re: Memory leak"
- In reply to: Julie: "Re: Abstract Class"
- Next in thread: Merlin: "Re: Abstract Class"
- Reply: Merlin: "Re: Abstract Class"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
