Re: Which is easier to learn - .NET or J2EE?

From: Wayne Scott (wscott_at_nac.net)
Date: 05/21/04

  • Next message: Karthik: "Re: inserting and popping an element from a queue."
    Date: 21 May 2004 00:27:24 -0700
    
    

    herman404@hotmail.com (Herman) wrote in message news:<d647544a.0405191350.184218a1@posting.google.com>...
    > Hi everyone, I'm currently studying for my Master's in Computer
    > Science, and I will be working on my thesis this summer. I've been
    > thinking about constructing a web services application for my thesis,
    > as I've been interested in this technology, and I haven't had a chance
    > to work with it in my last job. The issue is what platform to use:
    > .NET or J2EE?
    >
    > Prior to starting my MSc course, I worked for a software developer for
    > five years where I wrote Windows apps in Visual C++. However, during
    > my MSc course (which lasts a year), we've been working in J2SE and
    > nothing else (as far as programming languages go). So even though I
    > have more experience in C++, Java is fresher in my mind right now.
    > Since we're learning J2SE, I took a look at the J2EE 1.4 tutorial on
    > Sun's web site, and it completely blew me away. It looks like
    > something it would take years to master, (I only have three months to
    > do this project) and it seems that you have to be an expert in J2SE
    > before tackling J2EE.
    >
    > If I went with .NET, I already have experience with Microsoft
    > development tools, so the learning curve might be quicker. But as my
    > previous experience is in Visual C++ 6.0, .NET will be a whole new
    > ballgame for me too. Oh, and I would have to shell out big money for
    > the Visual Studio toolset. It would be at academic price, and I
    > probably only need Visual C++ or C#, but it still costs money when the
    > J2EE environment is free.
    >
    > What do you all think, given my past experience? I know there are
    > some people who abhor anything Microsoft, but being that I've worked
    > with early versions of the Visual Studio IDE, will .NET be a quick
    > learning curve? Or is J2EE not as hard to learn as it seems? If
    > anyone knows of any good tutorials on the internet, please point me in
    > that direction.
    >
    > Also, since this is just for learning, the web services apps are not
    > going to be very elaborate, as I'm wondering if I'm already biting off
    > more than I can chew! However, I was wondering what people prefer
    > between .NET and J2EE and why. No flame wars, please, although I feel
    > that it's going to happen anyways.
    >
    > Thanks for your feedback!
    > Herman

    You can BEA WebLogic Platform 8.1 and get a 1-year developer license
    free

    http://dev2dev.bea.com/index.jsp

    The develop community and news groups are great for support

    http://www.bea.com/framework.jsp?CNT=newsgroup.htm&FP=/content/services/customer_support

    A primary goal of the 8.1 platform is to make development easier with
    visual tools and code generation. Check out the evaluation guide.

    Best Wishes,
    Wayne Scott


  • Next message: Karthik: "Re: inserting and popping an element from a queue."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Which is easier to learn - .NET or J2EE?
      ... > Prior to starting my MSc course, I worked for a software developer for ... so the learning curve might be quicker. ... > J2EE environment is free. ... for the client use anything you please, asp, jsp or a GUI ...
      (comp.lang.java)
    • Re: Which is easier to learn - .NET or J2EE?
      ... > Prior to starting my MSc course, I worked for a software developer for ... so the learning curve might be quicker. ... > J2EE environment is free. ... for the client use anything you please, asp, jsp or a GUI ...
      (comp.lang.cpp)
    • Re: Which is easier to learn - .NET or J2EE?
      ... so the learning curve might be quicker. ... > J2EE environment is free. ... > with early versions of the Visual Studio IDE, ... You can BEA WebLogic Platform 8.1 and get a 1-year developer license ...
      (comp.lang.java)
    • Re: Access Application to Visual Studio
      ... I have written several FTP clients using .Net. ... > I do agree that this Access developer should probably stick with Access. ... > There are plenty of third-party companies out there that use Visual Studio ... > Think of it this way: You can buy a house. ...
      (microsoft.public.vstudio.general)
    • Re: Best choice for developing?
      ... VSTO gives you the Access run-time, so you simply package your existing ... especially the specific point about the ADE. ... > Visual Studio Professional might not be the better option? ... >>>> a developer friend that I want MS Visual Studio, ...
      (microsoft.public.access.developers.toolkitode)