Re: pointer versus reference in constructors
From: JKop (NULL_at_NULL.NULL)
Date: 05/25/04
- Previous message: JKop: "Re: virtual destructor"
- In reply to: DaKoadMunky: "Re: pointer versus reference in constructors"
- Next in thread: Bill Seurer: "Re: pointer versus reference in constructors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 00:59:23 GMT
DaKoadMunky posted:
> Note: As shown by Scott Meyers in his "Effective C++" series it is
> possible to have a null reference...
>
> T *ptr = 0;
> T &ref = *ptr;
>
> ...but he refers to such usage as evil and states something to the
> effect that the author of such code deserves whatever fate befalls
> them.
Even if they win a life-time supply of ice-cream, strawberry syrup and 100s
'n' 1000s?
-JKop
- Previous message: JKop: "Re: virtual destructor"
- In reply to: DaKoadMunky: "Re: pointer versus reference in constructors"
- Next in thread: Bill Seurer: "Re: pointer versus reference in constructors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|