Re: Makefile design
From: Victor Bazarov (v.Abazarov_at_comAcast.net)
Date: 05/29/04
- Next message: John Carson: "Re: #define versus const"
- Previous message: Daniel T.: "Re: pointer versus reference in constructors"
- In reply to: cppaddict: "Makefile design"
- Next in thread: Buster: "Re: Makefile design"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 17:37:48 GMT
"cppaddict" <hello@hello.com> wrote...
> If this is off-topic for this group,
Yes, it is. It has nothing to do with the language. Next time
you have a doubt whether a question is on topic, think whether
it can be answered in _terms_ of C++ language. Also, get yourself
a copy of the Standard to see what is included in the language.
It should help with dismissing doubts about threads, networking,
graphics, etc.
> please let me know a better place
> to post (I searched Google groups and couldn't find one myself).
>
> My question is about designing Makefiles. [...]
Try gnu.g++.* or gnu.utils.help.
V
- Next message: John Carson: "Re: #define versus const"
- Previous message: Daniel T.: "Re: pointer versus reference in constructors"
- In reply to: cppaddict: "Makefile design"
- Next in thread: Buster: "Re: Makefile design"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|