Re: C++ standard committee censor different opinions
From: Gary Labowitz (glabowitz_at_comcast.net)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: JKop: "Re: Code -> flow chart conversion software"
- Previous message: Andrey Tarasevich: "Re: Questionable compiler warning"
- In reply to: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: C++ standard committee censor different opinions"
- Next in thread: David Hilsee: "Re: C++ standard committee censor different opinions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:08:43 -0400
"Alf P. Steinbach" <alfps@start.no> wrote in message
news:40ed88a1.775729078@news.individual.net...
> * Xenos:
> >
> > "tom_usenet" <tom_usenet@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:hplqe0p7tqio8hu0g12hpmkb1001od2igg@4ax.com...
> > > >OH,yea!
>
> The entity calling itself Tom Usenet did _not_ write that.
O yea! I guessed it. I got lost in all the > > > > > > and couldn't figure
out who said what.
There must be a trick to it, but once it gets past three I lose track. Don't
take offence in any case, I meant none to anybody.
-- Gary
- Next message: JKop: "Re: Code -> flow chart conversion software"
- Previous message: Andrey Tarasevich: "Re: Questionable compiler warning"
- In reply to: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: C++ standard committee censor different opinions"
- Next in thread: David Hilsee: "Re: C++ standard committee censor different opinions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|