Re: Substitute 'float'?

From: Julie (julie_at_nospam.com)
Date: 07/08/04

Next message: lokb: "how to pass smart pointes to function."
Previous message: Julie: "Re: Purchasing The Standard"
In reply to: Andrey Tarasevich: "Re: Substitute 'float'?"
Next in thread: Rolf Magnus: "Re: Substitute 'float'?"
Reply: Rolf Magnus: "Re: Substitute 'float'?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 12:46:26 -0700

Andrey Tarasevich wrote:
> One fundamental obstacle that comes to mind is variadic functions.
> Passing non-POD classes as variadic arguments results in udefined behavior.

I was not aware of that. Not that I write many variadic functions...

Good to know, nonetheless.

Next message: lokb: "how to pass smart pointes to function."
Previous message: Julie: "Re: Purchasing The Standard"
In reply to: Andrey Tarasevich: "Re: Substitute 'float'?"
Next in thread: Rolf Magnus: "Re: Substitute 'float'?"
Reply: Rolf Magnus: "Re: Substitute 'float'?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Relevant Pages

Re: Substitute float?
... >> One fundamental obstacle that comes to mind is variadic functions. ... Another thing that comes to mind is conversions. ... built-in types are different from the rules for user defined types. ...
(comp.lang.cpp)
Re: multi-arguments function/macro
... " A. Saksena" wrote: ... > accepting any number of arguments. ... Look up 'variadic functions'. ... > I don't mind even if the upper limit to number of argument is fixed. ...
(alt.comp.lang.learn.c-cpp)