survival of c++

From: jimmy (jimmyvarghesemca_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/11/04 

Date: 11 Jul 2004 01:57:12 -0700

I am presently working in C++ .It is flexible and efficient.But it is
not the reasons for the language to survive as hardware is running
ahead the capabilities of software(why efficiency?).Java is a cool
language and .NET too even for mobile devices and embedded
systems.Anybody can give some valid reasons so that I can understaand
C++ will survive in the coming years.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: M2 for iPhone?
    ... (I got a bit more clarity about your reasons for Objective M2 now. ... language and interfacing. ... I use libtask because its lightweight and I ... GNU pth is probably more portable. ...
    (comp.lang.modula2)
  • Re: FORTH levels
    ... Forth does not enforce a grammar ... We needed a language, not just a vocabulary, but nobody recognized the distinction. ... those systems were largely running code written in the time frame before the Unix systems showed up. ... Maybe some reasons could help to improve ...
    (comp.lang.forth)
  • Re: Is VB Caca??
    ... Calling a function of a language "quirky" seems terribly judgmental. ... with all of the VB6 work out there that has not been converted to VB.Net, ... like Java fundamentally yet program in VB.Net for economic reasons and ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects
    ... behavior and argumentative style. ... completely irrelevant facts about me I'll certainly discount it. ... First are all the reasons I've stated before. ... had stronger justification to use the language less marginally. ...
    (comp.lang.forth)
  • Re: defining the behavior of zip(it, it) (WAS: Converting a flat list...)
    ... The real spirit of zipis ... a full understanding of zipcan be had by remembering ... making this a defined behavior results in making the language ... your reasons is ...
    (comp.lang.python)