Re: calloc.... Why?
From: JKop (NULL_at_NULL.NULL)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: tonysuper: "Re: problem with constructor/destructor?"
- Previous message: tom_usenet: "Re: What does the standard tell about NAN?"
- In reply to: Richard Herring: "Re: calloc.... Why?"
- Next in thread: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: calloc.... Why?"
- Reply: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: calloc.... Why?"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: calloc.... Why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:25:49 GMT
Richard Herring posted:
> And ignoring the "as-if" rule. Nothing _has_ to be
copied.
void Blah(std::vector a, std::vector b)
{
//Change a and b
}
Still sure nothing has to be copied?
-JKop
- Next message: tonysuper: "Re: problem with constructor/destructor?"
- Previous message: tom_usenet: "Re: What does the standard tell about NAN?"
- In reply to: Richard Herring: "Re: calloc.... Why?"
- Next in thread: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: calloc.... Why?"
- Reply: Karl Heinz Buchegger: "Re: calloc.... Why?"
- Reply: Richard Herring: "Re: calloc.... Why?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]