Re: default constructor in Java versus C++
From: Tony Morris (not_at_telling.you)
Date: 11/15/04
- Next message: Sam: "Re: when to use "new""
- Previous message: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: default constructor in Java versus C++"
- In reply to: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: default constructor in Java versus C++"
- Next in thread: Chris Smith: "Re: default constructor in Java versus C++"
- Reply: Chris Smith: "Re: default constructor in Java versus C++"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 08:03:17 GMT
> > Try Java Language Specification Second Edition 8.6.7 Default
Constructor.
>
> You mean §8.8.7.
>
> <url:
>
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/classes.doc.html#16823>
That I do.
-- Tony Morris http://xdweb.net/~dibblego/
- Next message: Sam: "Re: when to use "new""
- Previous message: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: default constructor in Java versus C++"
- In reply to: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: default constructor in Java versus C++"
- Next in thread: Chris Smith: "Re: default constructor in Java versus C++"
- Reply: Chris Smith: "Re: default constructor in Java versus C++"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
