Re: spurious wakeup
From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (qrczak_at_knm.org.pl)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: cdiggins_at_videotron.ca: "Re: Announcing OOTL version 0.1"
- Previous message: Tropos: "Re: Query: how to set #define values in parameters of 'make'"
- In reply to: Markus Elfring: "Re: spurious wakeup"
- Next in thread: Markus Elfring: "Re: spurious wakeup"
- Reply: Markus Elfring: "Re: spurious wakeup"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:24:28 +0100
Markus.Elfring@web.de (Markus Elfring) writes:
> Are you interested to encapsulate the predicate handling into a class?
In languages with function closures - yes.
In languages without - no.
> Can a "convenient" wait method (without spurious wakeups) become part
> of a library API?
Depends on the above.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ qrczak@knm.org.pl
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
- Next message: cdiggins_at_videotron.ca: "Re: Announcing OOTL version 0.1"
- Previous message: Tropos: "Re: Query: how to set #define values in parameters of 'make'"
- In reply to: Markus Elfring: "Re: spurious wakeup"
- Next in thread: Markus Elfring: "Re: spurious wakeup"
- Reply: Markus Elfring: "Re: spurious wakeup"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
