Re: Best way to "redefine" a std class
From: James Rafter (jjr2004a_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/08/04
- Next message: James Rafter: "Re: Best way to "redefine" a std class"
- Previous message: Jack Klein: "Re: why is this bad"
- In reply to: Nafai: "Best way to "redefine" a std class"
- Next in thread: James Rafter: "Re: Best way to "redefine" a std class"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 7 Dec 2004 18:48:07 -0800
In general, C++ classes which were intended to be inherited from, have
virtual destructors. This is something the STL containers do not have
and so were not intended to serve as base classes.
- Next message: James Rafter: "Re: Best way to "redefine" a std class"
- Previous message: Jack Klein: "Re: why is this bad"
- In reply to: Nafai: "Best way to "redefine" a std class"
- Next in thread: James Rafter: "Re: Best way to "redefine" a std class"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|