Re: using com technology
jcoffin_at_taeus.com
Date: 12/14/04
- Next message: Andrew Koenig: "Re: std::vector <mytype> allocation strategy"
- Previous message: Alan: "Re: reading a declaration"
- In reply to: Tony Johansson: "Re: using com technology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 14 Dec 2004 08:39:37 -0800
[ ... ]
> I reading in a book and here it says "COM is an "industry-standard"
software
> architecture supported by Microsoft, Digital Equipment Corporation,
and many
> other companies.
DEC went out of business (was bought out by Compaq, which was
subsequently bought out by HP) years ago. I suppose HP supports COM to
some degree (at least on PCs) but I'm not at all sure they really
support COM much beyond that (e.g. I don't recall having heard of their
porting COM to HP-UX).
> So for me it seems that the COM technology is not only bound to the
> Microsoft.
There's no theoretical reason it has to be, but for most practical
purposes it is.
-- Later, Jerry. The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
- Next message: Andrew Koenig: "Re: std::vector <mytype> allocation strategy"
- Previous message: Alan: "Re: reading a declaration"
- In reply to: Tony Johansson: "Re: using com technology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading