Re: FAQ issue: Guaranteed value ranges of fundamental types?
From: Victor Bazarov (v.Abazarov_at_comAcast.net)
Date: 02/05/05
- Previous message: Victor Bazarov: "Re: Sequence point problem?"
- In reply to: infobahn: "Re: FAQ issue: Guaranteed value ranges of fundamental types?"
- Next in thread: Mark McIntyre: "Re: FAQ issue: Guaranteed value ranges of fundamental types?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:35:14 -0500
"infobahn" <infobahn@btinternet.com> wrote...
> Victor Bazarov wrote:
>>
>> I wonder what _exactly_ does your copy say in 3.9.1/1 that makes you
>> derive that 'char <= short <= int'. But that doesn't matter. You are
>> actually correct, the C standard defined those relationships between
>> type sizes.
>
> C&V please.
I don't have a copy of C90. I used to have a printed copy at work,
but I don't work there any longer. I can be mistaken, therefore.
V
- Previous message: Victor Bazarov: "Re: Sequence point problem?"
- In reply to: infobahn: "Re: FAQ issue: Guaranteed value ranges of fundamental types?"
- Next in thread: Mark McIntyre: "Re: FAQ issue: Guaranteed value ranges of fundamental types?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|