Re: C++ vs C
From: Ioannis Vranos (ivr_at_remove.this.grad.com)
Date: 02/14/05
- Next message: Ioannis Vranos: "Re: inline keyword and linkage"
- Previous message: red floyd: "Re: Member template function specialization in a template class"
- In reply to: Julie: "Re: C++ vs C"
- Next in thread: Chris Hills: "Re: C++ vs C"
- Reply: Chris Hills: "Re: C++ vs C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:28:17 +0200
Julie wrote:
> In my personal embedded development experience, compared to C++, C is
> the preferred language: smaller code and less buggy compilers
I have no experience of embedded programming, and just from curiosity,
what kind of embedded devices do you have in mind? (For example I have
in mind mainly Pocket PC handhelds with Windows CE and compact .net
framework).
-- Ioannis Vranos http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys
- Next message: Ioannis Vranos: "Re: inline keyword and linkage"
- Previous message: red floyd: "Re: Member template function specialization in a template class"
- In reply to: Julie: "Re: C++ vs C"
- Next in thread: Chris Hills: "Re: C++ vs C"
- Reply: Chris Hills: "Re: C++ vs C"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
