Re: Operator Overloading
From: James Angi (jamesangi_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/23/05
- Next message: Zafar: "HOW TO HANDLE CONTROL_LOGOFF_EVENT handler"
- Previous message: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: Operator Overloading"
- In reply to: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: Operator Overloading"
- Next in thread: Howard: "Re: Operator Overloading"
- Reply: Howard: "Re: Operator Overloading"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:58:22 -0500
What can I say... it was on clearance. It's had some good material though.
Thanks for your help, that one little paragraph was causing me great
confusion.
~James
"Alf P. Steinbach" <alfps@start.no> wrote in message
news:421c2639.499554687@news.individual.net...
>* James Angi:
>>
>> Title: Sams Teach Yourself C++ in 21 days
>> Authors: Jesse Liberty and Bradley Jones
>> ISBN: 0-672-32711-2
>>
>> * Alf P. Steinbach:
>> >
>> > (and burn the book).
>
> Yes, definitely, why didn't you say it was _that_, uh, unspeakable?
>
> --
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
- Next message: Zafar: "HOW TO HANDLE CONTROL_LOGOFF_EVENT handler"
- Previous message: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: Operator Overloading"
- In reply to: Alf P. Steinbach: "Re: Operator Overloading"
- Next in thread: Howard: "Re: Operator Overloading"
- Reply: Howard: "Re: Operator Overloading"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|