Re: Adress of a struct vs address of its first field
eddy_ruslim_at_telkom.net
Date: 03/14/05
- Next message: evaned_at_gmail.com: "Re: the different between aaa m1[100] and aaa *p = new [100]"
- Previous message: Larry Brasfield: "Re: g++ problem!!!"
- In reply to: Ioannis Vranos: "Re: Adress of a struct vs address of its first field"
- Next in thread: Pete Becker: "Re: Adress of a struct vs address of its first field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 14 Mar 2005 10:56:00 -0800
Won't say too much theory but why not just try it on a compiler or ide.
You can even see the assembler results.personally the premis is true
for all truely ansi complience C++
well bits all the best of days that god may grant! (and not grand :-D).
standards can't live with it can't live without it
Edernity
---------
if it help
please help me provide better school supplies for childrenof indonesia.
it may be a donation but I merely ask you to letme send email to you
from one of the product of I'm affiliated and please register there on
mechant account free. If you even want you refund back on your dollar
of i-kard, its ok, I'll send you just use regular delivery on shipping
please. Please note this is very safe since this is a bonafid company.
remember your credit card company will confirm you on your purchase.
Still have doubts, sign on a personal account and let me contact you
again on it. just 1 email
also
I'm also affiliated to this site:
www.getaportal.com/portals/edd y_ruslim
- Next message: evaned_at_gmail.com: "Re: the different between aaa m1[100] and aaa *p = new [100]"
- Previous message: Larry Brasfield: "Re: g++ problem!!!"
- In reply to: Ioannis Vranos: "Re: Adress of a struct vs address of its first field"
- Next in thread: Pete Becker: "Re: Adress of a struct vs address of its first field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
