"older" IBM COBOL and DB2
From: William M. Klein (wmklein_at_nospam.netcom.com)
Date: 12/12/03
- Next message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: Need for packed decimal was Re: The quibble over nibbles (was Re: MVS Packed Decimal with no sign nibble?)"
- Previous message: Hugh Candlin: "Re: OT: Riddle"
- Next in thread: Ron: "Re: "older" IBM COBOL and DB2"
- Reply: Ron: "Re: "older" IBM COBOL and DB2"
- Reply: Colin Campbell: "Re: "older" IBM COBOL and DB2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:33:32 GMT
I know there have been previous discussions about when (what future release) of
CICS will *drop* support for even running OS/VS COBOL programs, but I don't know
if anyone else (besides me) *missed* the fact that DB V8 does *not* support
either
OS/VS COBOL
or
VS COBOL II
According to:
http://www.ibm.com/isource/cgi-bin/goto?it=usa_annred&on=203-019
The *only* COBOL compilers supported with this release of DB2 are:
COBOL: Any of the following:
ENTERPRISE COBOL V3.2 (5655-G53)
IBM COBOL for OS/390 and VM V2.2 (5648-A25), optionally, with VisualAgeŽ
COBOL Enterprise V2.2 (04L6579)
Similarly for PL/I
PL/I: Any of the following:
IBM Enterprise PL/I for z/OS and OS/390 V3 (5655-H31)
VisualAge PL/I for OS/390 V2.2 (5655-B22)
***
Everyone else may have noticed this last January when this announcement was
made, but it was just brought to my attention recently - and I thought I would
"highlight" it for sites that are still on "down-level" (no longer supported by
IBM) compilers.
-- Bill Klein wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
- Next message: Chuck Stevens: "Re: Need for packed decimal was Re: The quibble over nibbles (was Re: MVS Packed Decimal with no sign nibble?)"
- Previous message: Hugh Candlin: "Re: OT: Riddle"
- Next in thread: Ron: "Re: "older" IBM COBOL and DB2"
- Reply: Ron: "Re: "older" IBM COBOL and DB2"
- Reply: Colin Campbell: "Re: "older" IBM COBOL and DB2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|