Re: Date manipulation
From: Ian Dalziel (iandalziel_at_lineone.net)
Date: 12/26/03
- Previous message: Doug Scott: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 22:34:17 +0000
On 26 Dec 2003 14:23:56 -0500, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
>... and my point is that this is one way of doing it. Another way is to
>say 'here we have a quantity to be applied against the paycheck; is this
>quantity taxable or not? if it is taxable then apply the quantity in a
>fashion which shows taxation, if not then not.'
You're not listening, are you? Think about it - is it good to apply
the quantity in a way which shows taxation, or is it not? Apply the
question to payments and deductions, and see whether the answer is the
same.
- Previous message: Doug Scott: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]