Re: Date manipulation
docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 12/27/03
- Previous message: Ian Dalziel: "Re: Date manipulation"
- In reply to: Ian Dalziel: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Ian Dalziel: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Ian Dalziel: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 26 Dec 2003 18:21:53 -0500
In article <5ndpuvs9apbu2h66u3s9d0ammq4ho7fhje@4ax.com>,
Ian Dalziel <iandalziel@lineone.net> wrote:
>On 26 Dec 2003 14:23:56 -0500, docdwarf@panix.com wrote:
>
>>... and my point is that this is one way of doing it. Another way is to
>>say 'here we have a quantity to be applied against the paycheck; is this
>>quantity taxable or not? if it is taxable then apply the quantity in a
>>fashion which shows taxation, if not then not.'
>
>You're not listening, are you?
I'm trying to... and respond, as well.
>Think about it - is it good to apply
>the quantity in a way which shows taxation, or is it not?
If the status is untaxed then it should be applied as such, either
positively or negatively.
DD
- Previous message: Ian Dalziel: "Re: Date manipulation"
- In reply to: Ian Dalziel: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Ian Dalziel: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Ian Dalziel: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]