Re: Date manipulation
From: Judson McClendon (judmc_at_sunvaley0.com)
Date: 12/29/03
- Next message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: OT: Hemlines"
- Previous message: Howard Brazee: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: JerryMouse: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:15:42 GMT
"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote:
>
> Six invokes for a command used once in a program is nothing. Decisions such as
> this should be made solely on maintenance efficiency, not run-time efficiency.
If that code is in a transaction routine that is called 1000 times a second,
the overhead isn't 'nothing'. And what about turning over midnight after
the first call and before the last call? Remember Murphy's Law. :-)
-- Judson McClendon judmc@sunvaley0.com (remove zero) Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
- Next message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: OT: Hemlines"
- Previous message: Howard Brazee: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: JerryMouse: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]