Re: Date manipulation
From: Richard (riplin_at_Azonic.co.nz)
Date: 12/29/03
- Next message: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Doug Scott: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Dec 2003 14:38:59 -0800
"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote
> But you will notice that the code said:
> DISPLAY 'SIPR702 BEGAN ' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (5:2)
> '/' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (7:2)
> '/' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (1:4)
> ' ' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (09:2) hour
> ':' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (11:2)
> ':' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (13:2).
>
> Saying when a program starts doesn't happen 1000 times a second.
It does if 'SIPR702' is a sub program CALLed for each transaction.
> I was under the impression that this gets converted into one call though.
How would the compiler do that ?
- Next message: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Doug Scott: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]