Re: Date manipulation
docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 12/30/03
- Next message: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Dec 2003 18:45:22 -0500
In article <217e491a.0312291438.63031a9f@posting.google.com>,
Richard <riplin@Azonic.co.nz> wrote:
>"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote
>
>> But you will notice that the code said:
>> DISPLAY 'SIPR702 BEGAN ' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (5:2)
>> '/' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (7:2)
>> '/' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (1:4)
>> ' ' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (09:2) hour
>> ':' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (11:2)
>> ':' FUNCTION CURRENT-DATE (13:2).
>>
>> Saying when a program starts doesn't happen 1000 times a second.
>
>It does if 'SIPR702' is a sub program CALLed for each transaction.
... and if your Production Review process is such that it allows such a
thing to happen then your organisation deserves everything which might
happen to it.
DD
- Next message: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Richard: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
