Re: Date manipulation
From: Binyamin Dissen (postingid_at_dissensoftware.com)
Date: 12/30/03
- Next message: Howard Brazee: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "[OT] JCL DD name for CEE msgs?"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:56:35 +0200
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:18:25 GMT "Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote:
:>On 29-Dec-2003, riplin@Azonic.co.nz (Richard) wrote:
:>> > I was under the impression that this gets converted into one call though.
:>> How would the compiler do that ?
:>By having a little bit of smarts. It isn't difficult to see that the same
:>function was called 6 times in one display statement.
How does the compiler know that each time the same result will be returned?
Perhaps a static variable or random number affects the result?
-- Binyamin Dissen <bdissen@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
- Next message: Howard Brazee: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "[OT] JCL DD name for CEE msgs?"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|