Re: Date manipulation
From: Richard (riplin_at_Azonic.co.nz)
Date: 12/30/03
- Next message: Richard: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: [OT] JCL DD name for CEE msgs?"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 30 Dec 2003 10:51:40 -0800
"Howard Brazee" <howard@brazee.net> wrote
> > > I was under the impression that this gets converted into one call though.
> >
> > How would the compiler do that ?
>
> By having a little bit of smarts. It isn't difficult to see that the same
> function was called 6 times in one display statement.
And what if it was FUNCTION RANDOM that was being called 6 times ?
Would the compiler think that it is a good idea to make that just one
call ?
How about FUNCTION READ_NEXT_RECORD ?
- Next message: Richard: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: docdwarf_at_panix.com: "Re: [OT] JCL DD name for CEE msgs?"
- In reply to: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Reply: Howard Brazee: "Re: Date manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|