Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner"
From: LX-i (lxi0007_at_netscape.net)
Date: 12/31/03
- Next message: Thomas A. Li: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Previous message: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Donald Tees: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Next in thread: Donald Tees: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Reply: Donald Tees: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:56:13 -0600
Donald Tees wrote:
> LX-i wrote:
>
>> I'm with you. Other languages use something like
>> return-value = object.method(parameters)
>>
>> I'm surprised they didn't say
>> INVOKE method-name OF object-name ...
>>
>> This utilizes a very familiar COBOL construct, which is used to
>> uniquely identify data items.
>>
>> Any of you savvier OO guys know of a reason that that wouldn't make
>> more sense?
>>
>>
>
> In reply to that latter, you can do exactly that by using the set
> property method to invoke a procedure.
>
> IE MOVE "action-required" TO INVOCATION-METHOD of object-name.
Then, would you simply invoke the object? Is that second parameter
optional?
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ / \ / ~ Live from Montgomery, AL! ~ ~ / \/ o ~ ~ ~ / /\ - | ~ LXi0007@Netscape.net ~ ~ _____ / \ | ~ http://www.knology.net/~mopsmom/daniel ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I do not read e-mail at the above address ~ ~ Please see website if you wish to contact me privately ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Next message: Thomas A. Li: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Previous message: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Donald Tees: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Next in thread: Donald Tees: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Reply: Donald Tees: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|