Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner"
From: Thomas A. Li (tli_at_corporola.com)
Date: 12/31/03
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Thomas A. Li: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- In reply to: RH: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:10:55 GMT
Fully agreed.
OO is a methodology/philosophy. It can be embodied into COBOL in a specified
format, something like the bible has a new special interpretation no matter
it is accepted or not.
"RH" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dvmIb.98927$ss5.73119@clgrps13...
> I guess I am an OO COBOL foreigner ;)
>
> I know COBOL, but all my OO applications have been in Delphi, C++ or Java.
> The thing is, when I study OO theory it is not language specific (ex: Gang
> of four patterns etc.). So out of sheer curiosity I wonder if this is not
> the case for OO COBOL?
>
> I don't have any clients using OO COBOL, so I guess that's why I ask. It
> might happen someday...
>
>
>
- Next message: LX-i: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Thomas A. Li: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- In reply to: RH: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|