Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner"
From: Howard Brazee (howard_at_brazee.net)
Date: 12/31/03
- Next message: Donald Tees: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Thomas A. Li: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- In reply to: Thane Hubbell: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:54:12 GMT
On 31-Dec-2003, thaneh@softwaresimple.com (Thane Hubbell) wrote:
> > Your view of OO seems limited to COBOL (where I agree it has not fulfilled
> > its promise yet.) In other areas and other languages it HAS fulfilled its
> > promise.
>
> I've worked on large complex systems written in a variety of
> languages. I've never seen a procedural code based system collapse
> under it's own weight - I have seen SEVERAL OO systems implode.
So what is OO's promise?
(Big, complicated, interrelated systems are much more likely to implode than
other systems - regardless of methodology).
- Next message: Donald Tees: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Thomas A. Li: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- In reply to: Thane Hubbell: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Next in thread: Howard Brazee: "Re: Confessions of an "OO Foreigner""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|