comp.lang.cobol
By Author
1209 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Starting: 11/29/03
Ending: 12/31/03
- Alain Reymond
- Albert Paul
- Alistair Maclean
- AM
- Anthony Dilworth
- arenaTR
- arnb
- Arnold Trembley
- Bat Guano
- Benoît BESSE
- Binyamin Dissen
- Bob Wolfe
- bpm admin
- Capomaestro
- Chuck Stevens
- Re: Need for packed decimal was Re: The quibble over nibbles (was Re: MVS Packed Decimal with no sign nibble?) (12/12/03)
- Re: Need for packed decimal was Re: The quibble over nibbles (was Re: MVS Packed Decimal with no sign nibble?) (12/11/03)
- Re: Need for packed decimal was Re: The quibble over nibbles (was Re: MVS Packed Decimal with no sign nibble?) (12/11/03)
- Clark F. Morris, Jr.
- Cliff Peterson
- Colin Campbell
- Dan
- DanBar
- Daniel.
- dave johnstone
- David Olivadoti
- db
- DB Developer
- docdwarf_at_panix.com
- Donald Tees
- Doug Scott
- Douglas Gallant
- drosenbe0813
- Ed Guy
- Elite
- Francis ANDRE
- Frank Swarbrick
- Frederico Fonseca
- Gary
- George Mansoor
- GILAD
- Habitant
- Harley
- Herwig Huener & Josella Simone Playton
- HKM
- Howard Brazee
- hpy_awad_at_yahoo.com
- Hudson Reis
- Hugh Candlin
- Ian Dalziel
- Jack Sleight
- James
- James J. Gavan
- jce
- Jeff Lanam
- JerryMouse
- Jim Reinhart
- Joe Zitzelberger
- Johan den Boer
- John & Marie Sampson
- John Simpson
- Joseph Katnic
- JP Nelson
- Judson McClendon
- Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant??? (12/21/03)
- Re: The IBM box (was: Re: How do they do it? (was" Re: MVS Packed Decimal with no sign nibble?) (12/12/03)
- Re: Need for packed decimal was Re: The quibble over nibbles (was Re: MVS Packed Decimal with no sign nibble?) (12/12/03)
- Re: Need for packed decimal was Re: The quibble over nibbles (was Re: MVS Packed Decimal with no sign nibble?) (12/11/03)
- Kai Regenstein
- Karl Kiesel
- KELLIE FITTON
- Kevin Hansen
- Kindrick Ownby
- Larry Kahm
- Larry King
- LX-i
- Martin Jones
- Michael Mattias
- newsgroup sponsor
- no_at_spam.com
- Pam
- Pat Hall
- paul
- Paul Hoberg
- PAUL RAULERSON
- Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant??? (12/14/03)
- Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant??? (12/13/03)
- Paulo Vieira
- pegasus-lover
- Peter E. C. Dashwood
- Peter E.C. Dashwood
- Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant??? (12/19/03)
- Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant??? (12/13/03)
- Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant??? (12/12/03)
- Re: Mainframe not a good architecture for interactive was Re: What is the future of COBOL? Answer: Irrelevant??? (12/12/03)
- Peter Lacey
- PeterSamson NewsGroups
- Pierra
- R. Hendriks
- Ran
- Redd
- RH
- Richard