Re: CoBOL moved to OO
From: RKRayhawk (rkrayhawk_at_aol.com)
Date: 01/01/04
- Next message: RKRayhawk: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Maybe in reply to: Judson McClendon: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 01 Jan 2004 03:13:04 GMT
LX-i lxi0007@netscape.net
Date: 12/28/03 9:51 PM EST
Message-id: <vuv5lu7bq1122f@corp.supernews.com>
<<
I'm reading a great book about CBSE - this is some of the stuff just
from the first chapter.
>>
It is okay to reference the book specifically. Don't be surprise if we
ultimately hold your reposible for all of it's contents. bu tit ain't like we
will trounce you for just naming it with author and stuff. Your enthusiasm is
valued. Read on. Cite on!
How far are you so far on this holiday weekend?
Best Wishes
Bob Rayhawk
P.S. More than one contributor takes a slight turn at 'component' along this
'object' pathway. Y'all intrigue me.
- Next message: RKRayhawk: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Maybe in reply to: Judson McClendon: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: LX-i: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Reply: LX-i: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|