Re: CoBOL moved to OO
From: Judson McClendon (judmc_at_sunvaley0.com)
Date: 01/01/04
- Next message: Judson McClendon: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Judson McClendon: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: RKRayhawk: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: RKRayhawk: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 11:34:30 GMT
"RKRayhawk" <rkrayhawk@aol.com> wrote:
> "Judson McClendon" judmc@sunvaley0.com
> >
> > All recursive algorithms can be coded iteratively,
>
> Yeah.? Well maybe, but not by all persons. The issue is the labor force. Are
> there algorithms that can be coded more easily as recursive expressions versus
> iterative expressions? Is it the case that some folks can indeed see the
> algorithm at long last when they are thinking in recursive paradigms, whereas
> they is utterly blind to it in flatlanderese?
Yes, I agree. :-)
> I would assert, in opposition to your thought, that some folks can think the
> algorithm in recursion and not think it in iteration and that is why the
> availability of the tools of that genre matter.
I agree with you , I agree with your whole post.
Sorry if I gave another impression :-)
-- Judson McClendon judmc@sunvaley0.com (remove zero) Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
- Next message: Judson McClendon: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Judson McClendon: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: RKRayhawk: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: RKRayhawk: "Re: CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|