Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4

docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 01/02/04 

Date: 1 Jan 2004 18:52:47 -0500

In article <bt22l1$i9h$1@panix1.panix.com>,
Bradley K. Sherman <_UNSPAM_bks@panix.com> wrote:
>In article <bt1n96$jds$1@panix1.panix.com>, <docdwarf@panix.com> wrote:
>>
>>Now consider... it is a date-related problem ('non-expiring database
>>license... sending expiration messages'), it occurred after 31 Dec 1999...
>>hey, it even kicked in on 01 Jan! Is this, then, a 'Y2K problem'?
>
>By the standards of csy2k that is a three-sigma Y2k problem.

Mr Sherman, I have no idea what 'the standards of csy2k' might be... but
by other standards this would, indeed...

... sigma phi nothing.

DD

Relevant Pages