Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4

From: Peter E.C. Dashwood (dashwood_at_enternet.co.nz)
Date: 01/02/04 

Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 14:18:09 +1300

<docdwarf@panix.com> wrote in message news:bt2bsf$jda$1@panix1.panix.com...
> In article <bt22l1$i9h$1@panix1.panix.com>,
> Bradley K. Sherman <_UNSPAM_bks@panix.com> wrote:
> >In article <bt1n96$jds$1@panix1.panix.com>, <docdwarf@panix.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>Now consider... it is a date-related problem ('non-expiring database
> >>license... sending expiration messages'), it occurred after 31 Dec
1999...
> >>hey, it even kicked in on 01 Jan! Is this, then, a 'Y2K problem'?
> >
> >By the standards of csy2k that is a three-sigma Y2k problem.
>
> Mr Sherman, I have no idea what 'the standards of csy2k' might be... but
> by other standards this would, indeed...
>
> ... sigma phi nothing.
>

Only if it was a "tale told by an idiot", Doc <G>

Pete.