Re: No panic - but .. Y2K + 4

docdwarf_at_panix.com
Date: 01/02/04 

Date: 2 Jan 2004 05:07:14 -0500

In article <3ff4c756_5@news.athenanews.com>,
Peter E.C. Dashwood <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote:
>
><docdwarf@panix.com> wrote in message news:bt2bsf$jda$1@panix1.panix.com...
>> In article <bt22l1$i9h$1@panix1.panix.com>,
>> Bradley K. Sherman <_UNSPAM_bks@panix.com> wrote:
>> >In article <bt1n96$jds$1@panix1.panix.com>, <docdwarf@panix.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>Now consider... it is a date-related problem ('non-expiring database
>> >>license... sending expiration messages'), it occurred after 31 Dec 1999...
>> >>hey, it even kicked in on 01 Jan! Is this, then, a 'Y2K problem'?
>> >
>> >By the standards of csy2k that is a three-sigma Y2k problem.
>>
>> Mr Sherman, I have no idea what 'the standards of csy2k' might be... but
>> by other standards this would, indeed...
>>
>> ... sigma phi nothing.
>>
>
>Only if it was a "tale told by an idiot", Doc <G>

There are those, Mr Dashwood, who would agree that many such tales have
made their way through comp.software.year-2000, aye.

DD

Relevant Pages