Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO
From: Judson McClendon (judmc_at_sunvaley0.com)
Date: 01/02/04
- Next message: Judson McClendon: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Howard Brazee: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:32:11 GMT
"Peter E.C. Dashwood" <dashwood@enternet.co.nz> wrote:
>
> Your ability to complicate essentially simple processes never ceases to
> astound me...
Your ability to overlook potential pitfalls astounds me... ;-)
> If something has "granularity" your real time system must recognise that.
> There are standard practices and procedures for doing this. You can adjust
> the "sample rate" or adjust the tolerances. The only time I ever encountered
> this was in control of an oil refinery; the application of it to Business is
> improbable, but, even if it were, the same techniques would solve the
> problem.
If that 'granularity' requires processing a million transactions at once,
you are going to have fun implementing that 'real time. :-)
Pete, you can't use your own experiences as the criteria for what can't
happen, only what can. It is a truism in science that you cannot prove a
negative. There are situations out there that you and I have never even
imagined. I'm saying "Be flexible, and allow for the fact that you can't
know everything." You are saying "I know everything I could possibly
need to know, and it can't happen." It is a good bet which position is
going to get steamrollered when the unforseen does happen. Just
because you or I haven't witnessed it is no proof that it can't happen in
circumstances we haven't encountered. I have seen programs run 20
years before bombing on a bug that was there all along. :-)
-- Judson McClendon judmc@sunvaley0.com (remove zero) Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
- Next message: Judson McClendon: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Previous message: Howard Brazee: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- In reply to: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: Peter E.C. Dashwood: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|