Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO
From: Doug Scott (dwscott_at_ieee.org)
Date: 01/06/04
- Next message: Richard: "Re: multiple file reads and sorts"
- Previous message: Habitant: "Re: Y2K4 with XP"
- In reply to: Pierra: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: Pierra: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Reply: Pierra: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 18:32:07 GMT
Pierra,
> My "problem" is not with the Commit verb. My "problem" is not being
> able to "roll back" committed transactions to a point in time. And that
> is a "feature" of "modern" database systems.
Sure; if your company is willing to put up with the cost of journalising
every transaction all the time, that's fine. You must be in the financial
services area, where money is like water :-)
--- Doug dwscott@ieee.org
- Next message: Richard: "Re: multiple file reads and sorts"
- Previous message: Habitant: "Re: Y2K4 with XP"
- In reply to: Pierra: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Next in thread: Pierra: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Reply: Pierra: "Re: (not entirely...) OT: OPINION... chicken entrails, runic stones, and crystal balls... WAS CoBOL moved to OO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|